The Dark Shell (2) Anti-Matter

The Dark Shell (2) Anti-Matter

03/10/02

There seems to be at least two options as to how an anti-matter universe might be generated. First is the possibility that an anti-matter universe is created at a rather great distance from our universe and that like our universe, it will fall back into the primordial wall of dark matter and baryonic matter. The next possibility would be that the anti-matter universe has its own wall of dark matter and anti-matter into which it falls. The common boundary would be a singularity in either wall. If the overall system is a closed system (i.e., conservation of energy/mass) which seems likely, then the cycle of generating big bangs may be very ancient. The number of cycles of the primordial wall could easily be 100s of billions of cycles

03/12/02

Another possibility is that only one major region (dark matter & matter or dark matter & anti-matter) generates a sink and it alone provides the dark matter and energy for the creation of a big bang in the other region . This is a nice idea in that the big bang in the other region could be at a great distance from its wall since the two regions may not be symmetric. If so, then our universe would have been created by or from an anti-matter/dark matter region in a sink created in its wall as it recedes. Over time this mass/energy exchange between regions would tend to balance out.

It would seem that dark matter probably folds up when it enters a black hole. This would tend to increase the constraint radius which in turn would tend to compact or pull in the dark matter just beyond the constraint radius. Energy lost as radiation reduces the effective mass of a galaxy, a process which would tend to decrease the constraint radius. There is an interesting question as to what happens when a black hole is drawn into a sink. The sink probably destroys the black hole.

03/13/02

What is the footprint of the impact of our universe with the wall? Assuming that our universe is spherical and at least 30 billion light years across, the assumed limitation of compressibility of dark matter should be considered. Compression of the tenuous dark matter between the universe and the wall should become appreciable well before contact. As this region approaches the maximum density of dark matter in the wall (and at galaxies) the current acceleration of local baryonic matter outward should decrease.

Locally the surface of the wall probably is far from uniform as the interior should be chaotic. A mushy impact seems likely with the second half of our universe spreading out somewhat. Some sort of shock wave arising from the impact can be anticipated but it may be difficult to detect. Again assuming a time constant of 300 billion years for the oscillating motion of the wall and assuming that our big bang occurred as it receded, say during the first quarter of the cycle, roughly half a cycle or 150 billion years is required before the wall returns to impact the universe. Note that if this model of the universe is correct, the wall may generate substantial numbers of universes. Thus it might be possible to identify portions of another universe as it meshes with ours. In any case, as our universe will be much larger than now when impact occurs, the amplitude of the oscillation of the wall becomes important. For now this factor remains an unknown.

Assuming that there is some validity to the foregoing, it seems statistically likely that some baryonic structures will, on occasion, be ejected from the wall toward our universe. This would be evidenced by noting large blue shifts in their light spectra. A substantial number of these should be noted as final closure between the universe and the wall commences.

04/07/02

As sinks may be open for different periods of time for different conditions, the size of the associated big bangs would also vary in size as a function of the amount of material captured.